Beyond the Binary-Chapters(1-4)
Generally speaking, psychologists and almost any person on the street will tell you that
visuals and looks are the first aspect that we notice about anyone when meeting them for the first
time, or even passing by them in a public location. People take notice of what you are wearing,
what color is your hair, what color is your skin, what do your features look like and what kind of
emotions does one feel when they look at you, how do you smell like, how tall are you, how slim
or heavy are you, and so on. Looks and visuals make up the majority of one's impression of
someone, and that person’s words only change or supplement the first impression, if the
visualizer is willing to engage in further conversation. When we are always physically analyzing
and processing what kind of potential a person could have in our lives or interactions; whether
they could be our friend, lover, spouse, etc, then the same would go for trying to attribute a
gender to someone when you first see them. Is it on purpose? No. It is simply human nature and
perhaps one of the first active instincts that become activated when you see someone. It is innate
and automatic.
We physically analyze others for various reasons apart from them possibly being our new
friend, lover, or spouse. It could happen because we are assessing whether we feel safe around
this person, do they make us feel fearful, uncomfortable, relatable, and if we feel any kind of
connection at all. It can be considered that assessing someone physically can always be a way to
be alert, for example, if you see someone with a gun and ski mask and perhaps an empty bag,
you will probably pick up on the fact this could be a lethal bank robber. So, you stay away from
and act accordingly. If you see someone who looks healthy, has attractive features, smells
relatively nice or like nothing at all (as long as they don’t smell bad), then your impression will
be to want to approach them further and try to forge some sort of relationship (not necessarily
romantic), just a human-to-human relationship. We physically attribute characteristics to people
when we see them, also based on our personal and past biases.
To ask this question of whether or not we could communicate with someone who is
transgender or gender queer without attributing gender on them, is as if to say that people who
are only interested in the opposite sex, do this to transgender and gender queer on purpose and
out of some type of dislike or hate. This habit of forming first impressions and attributing things
on people for the first time is simply a form of human curiosity taking place. I have met many
transgender people, mostly males changing to females, and although this did not effect how I
spoke or felt about them--in the beginning there was certainly curiosity on my end as to what to
address them as, and how to speak them appropriately. Because you can’t talk to a male, who
thinks in a masculine way, about feminine topics. However, if it’s a male who identifies as a
female and although they look like a male, they think like a female, then you know that you can
talk to them about certain topics.
So when we are trying to assess whether a transgender person is a male or a female, it is
out of curiousity and out of politeness for that person and ourselves. For example, it would not
be appropriate to talk to a female (a man who sexually identifies as a woman) about working out
at the gym to gain six-packs. It also wouldn’t be appropriate to talk to a man (a woman who
sexually identifies as a man) about shopping, respectively. Plus, I feel as though this is where it
would seem ignorant and insensitive to ignore what a person truly wants to be recognized and
simply placing your own attributes and beliefs onto them. To wonder in curiosity about someone
based on their looks is something everyone does, but what they do further from here is where the
divide in thinking and manners comes in. Some will be rude and voice their hurtful opinions
saying, “you look like a man so I’m going to treat you like one”, and others will be more careful
and patient and either wait for the person to drop obvious hints or even share openly what gender
they are, or politely ask them out of respect.
It is not necessarily the gender attributing thought process that is bad, but rather how the
person decides to act and talk after they’ve made attributions and assumptions about a
genderqueer or transgender person. As (Dembroff, 2007) puts it “By overlooking those who
identify outside of the binary—we are left without tools for understanding these new and quickly
growing gender identifications.” In other words relating back to the prompt question, it is again
not the nature of wanting to attribute characteristics onto someone that is unhealthy, but rather
the ignorance that people breed in not wanting to expand on what they already know about
different types of sexuality. It is ignorance that holds people back from progressing in this aspect
of society. To be educated on any topic for that matter, is what allows people to at least agree to
disagree and refrain from violent conflict. Dembroff does however, mention that “Despite this
ever growing public awareness, nonbinary gender identities have been an afterthought within
philosophy of gender, and especially metaphysical discussions of gender”, this is to say that
gender queer and transgender are ignored and overlooked and paid no heed to in any sense,
including cinema, literature, and all other aspects of social life. However, my belief is that, even
if one is transgender or genderqueer, still, in a sense you are binary if you think about it. A
transgender man prefers women, a transgender woman prefers men. Although their mental
secuality is different from their body, they are still loving someone of the opposite sex,
technically. The takeaway from all this is that, although gender attributing (meaning assessing
someone physically in order to form first impressions) happens innately and automatically, it is
not the culprit of how people behave towards gender queer or transgender. What is the actual
culprit is the ignorance and past biases that people struggle to destroy and reform in order to be
more accepting or at least, respectful not to make rude gestures.
Hi Runa,
ReplyDeleteA point of clarification: you write, "However, my belief is that, even if one is transgender or genderqueer, still, in a sense you are binary if you think about it. A transgender man prefers women, a transgender woman prefers men. Although their mental secuality is different from their body, they are still loving someone of the opposite sex, technically."
There are few different concepts that I think have gotten tangled up here. We may want to distinguish between a person's gender identity and a person's sexuality. Someone may identify as a woman and be sexually attracted to women, or may be sexually attracted to men, or to non-binary folks etc. Identifying as a woman doesn't necessarily mean that you are sexually attracted to men, right? Being a transgender woman doesn't necessarily mean that you are sexually attracted to men either (as far as I know!)
Additionally, someone who has a non-binary gender identity is someone who does not exclusively identify as a man nor exclusively identify as a woman. That is, they fall outside of the man/woman binary distinction.
Look back at this passage from your post: "To ask this question of whether or not we could communicate with someone who is transgender or gender queer without attributing gender on them, is as if to say that people who are only interested in the opposite sex, do this to transgender and gender queer on purpose and out of some type of dislike or hate." I'm not totally sure I understand what you are saying here, perhaps you could rephrase it?
Do you think that it is possible to encounter a non-binary person in public for the first time and refrain from making a judgment about that person's gender? Would this be possible if the person you encountered was a man or a woman?
Hi again Runa,
ReplyDeleteI mean to also ask you about your discussion of "thinking like a female/male". What do you mean by this? Is there a single unified way that there is to think like a female? That ideal initially strikes me as implausible in part because of the variety of ways of thinking that I have encountered in my life.
Related to this, you write: "it would not be appropriate to talk to a female (a man who sexually identifies as a woman) about working out at the gym to gain six-packs. It also wouldn’t be appropriate to talk to a man (a woman who sexually identifies as a man) about shopping, respectively." Why not? I identify as a woman and am happy to talk about fitness and six-packs and could care less about shopping conversations. Why think that it would be inappropriate for someone to talk to me about working out at the gym (or to subject me to shopping talk)?