He/She/They/Ze
Listening to Elvin Pedersen-Nielsen's TEDx Talk on Educating Kids About Gender
Norms, showed me just how uncomfortable, exposed, and targeted, transgender and
gender queer people feel in society and the world. His analogy using the “table” gave me a
relatable perspective to look from in my own way, despite that I am neither transgender or
gender queer. By using this analogy, he was able to help many unaware viewers on his lens of
perspective. I have heard several occasions on which someone has committed a violent crime
because of their sexuality, but there was something about this video that actually shook me and
made me realize how serious and fatal the matter is. His tone of voice while talking about how
people like him feel put “on the spot” when they need to identify themselves and possibly be
prepared for criticism is something heart-wrenching.
Needless to say, even if I had not watched this video, I would still agree with the
moderate claim from Robert Dembroff and Daniel Wodrak’s He/She/They/Ze that we have a
responsibility of not just using the binary terms when describing someone. Because everyone has
the right to own their identity and to be appropriately and respectfully addressed as needed. I
don’t however, agree with the radical claim because it is simply too extreme and in the end
result, would not make a helpful or meaningful impact whatsoever. To remove gender specific
pronouns altogether is senseless because in a way, this claim is saying that in order for the
genderqueer and transgenders to have their identity, we have to lose ours and mix in with that
population.
Let’s assume we did this for a moment, removed all He’s and She’s, His and Hers- now
how are you going to navigate to an appropriate bathroom, buy the right clothes, go to the doctor
without them asking you multiple questions about your sexual identity before they get to the
actual reason you are there? To remove pronouns would be to, in a sense, tip toe around the
situation. Another reason is, to take away pronouns will result in even more confusion altogether,
we are not trying to be more confused than we already are, the point is to be clear and respectful.
Taking away pronouns won’t stop someone from giving a transgender nasty looks and being
violent towards them. What should be done is, these people are given the opportunity and chance
to change their identity on their birth certificates and records that allows them to be henceforth,
always addressed and considered to be what they have chosen to identify as on their legal papers.
This is fair and makes sense, because it’s what we all do at the time of birth, our parents and
doctors identity our gender based on our sexual organs, and while transgender and gender queer
don’t know they are trans and queer until they’re a little older, they should be given the exclusive
opportunity to change this when they’ve decided what they identify with. To verify, they can be
asked a series of questions regarding their sexual preferences in order to confirm that they are
indeed a trans, queer, bi, and so on.

Hi Runa,
ReplyDeleteI have a few follow-up questions for you. You wrote: "I have heard several occasions on which someone has committed a violent crime because of their sexuality". I'm not sure what you meant by this. The sentence seems to imply that you are referring to cases in which the person who committed the crime committed it because of their sexuality. Is that what you intended?
You also wrote: "Let’s assume we did this for a moment, removed all He’s and She’s, His and Hers- now how are you going to navigate to an appropriate bathroom, buy the right clothes, go to the doctor without them asking you multiple questions about your sexual identity before they get to the actual reason you are there? To remove pronouns would be to, in a sense, tip toe around the situation". I'm not sure I follow your line of thinking here. Supposing we remove all references to "he/him/his" and "she/her/hers", why assume that we would keep gender-specific bathrooms? What do you mean by "the right clothes" in this context? And I'm not sure I understand exactly what you were imagining going wrong in the doctor's office either--perhaps you can explain more thoroughly.
I also wanted to ask you about the final sentence of your post: "To verify, they can be asked a series of questions regarding their sexual preferences in order to confirm that they are indeed a trans, queer, bi, and so on." How do you see a person's gender identity and that person's sexual orientation being related to one another. In other words, why think questions about one's sexuality are relevant to the issue of changing one's gender as recorded on legal documents? For what it's worth--I personally think there could be interesting interactions between gender identity and sexuality to explore, but I don't think they are obvious--so I would genuinely like to read your thoughts on this!
Take care,
Dr. Nora